|
The deputy is confident that a significant portion of them cannot adequately protect their clients’ personal information.
The opinions of experts and market participants surveyed by RSpectr were divided.
The introduction of the category of “special operator for processing personal data” will allow businesses to focus on their core business, confident that the data is stored in a secure location, commented Artem Sheikin, member of the Federation Council Committee on Constitutional Legislation and State Building.
Indeed, the issue of creating a separate category of trusted personal data (PD) operators is currently being discussed, who would be required to undergo special accreditation and would content writing service only receive the right to work with data if they meet certain criteria, noted Anton Nemkin, a member of the State Duma IT Committee.
The deputy emphasized that special operators must have a reliable infrastructure for storing and processing information, qualified employees, and not be noticed in cyber incidents.

Anton Nemkin, State Duma:
– Business certainly needs such special operators. For example, the Unified Biometric System (UBS) now operates according to a similar scheme, in which all biometric data of our citizens is stored, and companies work only with their vectors.
In addition, the issue of whether trusted operators need to have some kind of "insurance" in case of a leak is still being discussed, the deputy continued. In particular, they should have the opportunity to pay the assigned administrative fines. This is necessary in order to avoid a situation where
the company was fined up to 15 million rubles, but it can offer nothing but bankruptcy and liquidation
By the way, almost 70% of companies in the small and medium business segment are concerned about this today.
Business does not need special operators for processing personal data, believes Alexey Muntyan, founder of Privacy Advocates. In his opinion, the example of the Unified Biometric System and its special operator, the Center for Biometric Technologies, can hardly be called successful.
|
|